Nike, Fitbit/Google, Under Armour Fail against Inventor Cellspin Soft and Garteiser Honea

(April 14, 2021 – Oakland, CA) Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the Northern District of California has denied a concerted attempt to invalidate an inventor’s patents by a force comprised of Fitbit, Inc., Moov, Inc., Nike, Inc., Under Armour, Inc., Fossil Group, Inc., Misfit Inc., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA Inc., Nikon Inc., and Nikon Americas, Inc. According to Bloomberg Law, Cellspin Soft, Inc., with a team led by Garteiser Honea’s Scott Fuller and Randall...

- -
Read more

Intel Must Pay $2.2B to VLSI, says WDTX Jury and Judge Albright

(March 2, 2021 – Waco, Texas) — Intel was just found making significant money off two of VLSI’s patented inventions without any regard for the inventor of those technologies and has been ordered to pay $2.18 Billion in damages.  These patents, US7,725,759, a “System and method of managing clock speed in an electronic device,” and US7,523,373, “Minimum memory operating voltage technique” were the subject of a case captioned VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel...

- -
Read more

Apple, Inc.

lost its Motion to Stay in NavBlazer, LLC v. Apple, Inc, Case Case 6:20-cv-00085-ADA, on July 29, 2020.  Apple wanted to stay the case pending resolution of its earlier Motion to Transfer to the Northern District of California.  The Judge was unconvinced and responded quickly, denying the motion.  Apple was represented here by Alan Littmann, Doug Winnard, Michael Pieja, and Samuel E. Schoenburg of Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP, supported by J. Stephen Ravel of Kelly Hart...

- -
Read more

Garteiser Honea announces Tom Fasone as new Partner!

(Tyler, Texas) — On October 29, 2019, IP Litigation Boutique Garteiser Honea announced that Tom Fasone III joined the firm’s ranks as a Partner. Prior to Garteiser Honea, Mr. Fasone practiced complex commercial and intellectual property litigation for over two decades at the highly acclaimed national law firm of McKool Smith and served as the first Vice President and General Counsel at a Dallas based commercial lighting technology company.   “We are elated by...

- -
Read more

Protected: 2019 Bench Bar photos

Protected: 2019 Bench Bar photos This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: Password: ...

- -
Read more

Dell loses Motion to Dismiss for Res Judicata

Dell loses Motion to Dismiss for Res Judicata (March 25, 2019 – Tyler, Texas) Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle denied Dell’s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for Res Judicata in TXED 6:18-cv-0138, consolidated into 6:18-cv-0030, Dkt 158.   Res Judicata (literally, ‘a thing judged’) is an argument that the question at hand has already been decided previously.  In this case, Dell was asserting that Cypress Lake Software’s previous and successful lawsuit against Dell over certain products running Windows 10...

- -
Read more

Garteiser Honea announces Scott Fuller as new Partner!

(San Francisco, October 10, 2018) — On Wednesday, IP Litigation Boutique Garteiser Honea announced the addition of M. Scott Fuller as a new partner. Formerly a partner and co-chair of the Texas IP Litigation Practice Group at the international firm Locke Lord LLP, Mr. Fuller is a powerful addition to the already formidable group at Garteiser Honea. “We are obviously very excited to have Scott join the firm,” said co-founder Randall T. Garteiser.  “He brings many years of...

- -
Read more

Garteiser Honea wins one more as Judge Denies Motion to Transfer HP

(June 27, 2018 – Tyler, Texas) Today, Garteiser Honea won a key victory for its client against HP, Inc., represented by Jones Day in an attempt to move venue to the N.D. Cal in TXED 6:17-cv-0462 Dkt. 30, consolidated as 6:17-cv-0300-RWS, Dkt. 91. Hewlett-Packard had a sufficient presence in the Eastern District of Texas such that the court ruled it was “clearly not more convenient to move the case to the Northern District of California.” In his ruling, Judge Schroeder did not put any...

- -
Read more

David Sundin

“After 20 years owning and running a successful East Texas chemical plant, I received notice that a Court had issued a Trademark Infringement Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against my company and against me as an individual. The case related to a group of dielectric fluid specialty chemicals. Attorney Garteiser promptly got the TRO dropped and successfully defended us against the Plaintiff’s attempt to get a preliminary injunction. I highly recommend his firm, Garteiser...

- -
Read more

Samsung to pay $11M to Rembrandt Wireless for Infringement of Bluetooth Patents

(Marshall, TX, March 28, 2018) – Judge Gilstrap today ordered Samsung to pay $11,111,920 to Rembrandt Wireless for infringement of two patents related to Bluetooth technology. In Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP vs. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, case no. 2:13-cv-00213-JRG (EDTX), Judge Rodney Gilstrap today granted Rembrandt’s proposal to calculate royalties per-unit sold rather than Samsung’s...

- -
Read more

Telebrands’ Balloons of Willful Infringement are Popped by Bunch O Balloons.

(Tyler TX, November 21, 2017) — A jury verdict awarded $12.3 million to Plaintiffs Tinnus Enterprises and ZURU Ltd (collectively, “Plaintiff”) due to damages in a patent infringement case against a well known U.S. telemarketing firm, Telebrands and its subsidiary Bulbhead.com. The patent for the product “Bunch O Balloons” was originally issued on Jan. 16, 2016 in patent No. 9242749. Owner and inventor Josh Malone and ZURU’s Chief Operating Officer Anna Mowbray voiced their...

- -
Read more

VIZIO, Inc. & the Two Dismissal Rule

(Santa Ana CA, May 22, 2017) – While the two dismissal rule is unfortunately employed by patent and copyright infringers as a strategy to avoid a fair trial on the merits, blatant misuse of Rule 41 may move a court to deny application of the two dismissal rule. See Two Strikes and You’re ‘Out!’ – FRCP 41 & Copyright Trolls at DieTrollDie.com (accessed Nov. 8, 2017). Moreover, it may also place an infringer in the unfavorable position of trying a case before a judge who views its...

- -
Read more

TC Heartland May Not Affect Many Cases Filed in the Eastern District of Texas

(Washington D.C., May 22, 2017) – Today the Supreme Court issued its TC Heartland ruling. The case, TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC was summarized by many in the media as significantly impacting venue, but ultimately cannot impact much at all. The question spoke to 28 U.S. Code § 1400(b), which says: (b) Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of...

- -
Read more

Google Ordered to Pay $20M to Inventors of Anti-Malware Technology used in Chrome

(February 14, 2017 – Marshall, Texas) – A jury has found Google liable for $20M in damages for infringing all claims of three anti-malware patents in their Chrome web browser. In Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, Inc., 2:13-cv-0103-JRG-RSP, engineers Allen Rozman and Alfonso Cioffi, both Texans, created the technology to keep internet users safe and were deemed the inventors of such by the federal Patent and Trademark Office. When Google began using it, they were forced to sue to maintain...

- -
Read more

Apple Could Only Win A Transfer Motion — Not a Trial

(December 15, 2016 – Marin County, California) – Is filing a transfer motion worth it?  A company’s backyard doesn’t seem like the fairest place to have a trial when the damage occurred in a another state, but that’s what happened here.  However, the people in California found Apple infringed the asserted patents, the way it would have happened in Texas. Critics say E.D. Texas juries award too much, but really they just understand property rights better than most.  Most people...

- -
Read more

VirnetX v Apple, Round 3. Jury votes Apple owes $302 million.

(Tyler, Texas – October 4, 2016) – VirnetX won again against Apple.  A jury calculated that technology giant Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) owes more than $302 million in royalties to Nevada-based VirnetX Holding Corp. (NYSE: VHC) for infringing internet security patents owned by VirnetX.  Jurors in the Tyler, Texas, courtroom of Judge Robert W. Schroeder III delivered the verdict in favor of VirnetX on Sept. 30 after one week of trial. The case is VirnetX Inc., et al. v. Apple Inc.,...

- -
Read more

Rembrandt v Samsung Closes at $15.7 Million

(Tyler, Texas – February 26, 2016)  A jury unanimously handed down a $15.7 million verdict against Samsung in Rembrandt Wireless Technologies LP v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, TXED 2:13-cv-00213. The case involved two Bluetooth technologies owned by Rembrandt, US Patent Numbers 8,023,580 and 8,457,228, both of which were found “infringed” and “not invalid” by the jury. Reviewing the verdict, Judge Gilstrap found that the verdict was reasonable and...

- -
Read more

Samsung Also Found to be Willfully Infringing in $7M Verdict

(Tyler, Texas – February 9, 2016)  A jury handed down a $7 million verdict against Samsung on Friday, finding they willfully infringed various patents owned by Imperium IP Holdings. A finding of willfulness notably allows the Judge to increase the fine, up to triple. The case involved US Patent Numbers 6,271,884 and 6,836,290, both technologies for improving the quality of photos. The jury disagreed with Samsung’s contention that the patents were obvious, awarding Imperium $4.8...

- -
Read more

Post-Alice §101 Challenge Denied in Gonzalez v InfoStream

(Tyler, Texas – February 6, 2016) Judge Roy Payne today sent down a recommendation in Gonzalez v. InfoStream Group et al. (TXED 2:14-cv-00906-JRG, Docket No. 60) that producing “digital labels” is patent eligible under §101. He thus denied defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on those grounds. A granting of a Motion for Summary Judgment is what the public sometimes refers as the case being “thrown out.” These Motions for Summary Judgment argue that...

- -
Read more

Apple’s Damages in VirnetX Enhanced to $625M after Finding of Willfulness

(Tyler, Texas – February 3, 2016) It’s an infinite loop, alright. After successfully overturning a $368 million judgment in which Apple was found guilty of infringement, a jury revisited the case and found Apple to have been willful in their infringement and to have continued unabated since the earlier verdict. They reinstated and “enhanced” the damages, now $625 million, in in Apple vs. VirnetX, TXED 6:12-cv-00855-RWS. The patents in question, each belonging to...

- -
Read more

ContentGuard v Apple – $420,000 Bill of Costs Approved by Judge Gilstrap

(Tyler, Texas – January 20, 2016) After a successful defense, Judge Gilstrap today granted Apple’s Bill of Costs in the amount of $420,000. This came two months to the day after a jury verdict denying Plaintiff ContentGuard’s contentions in the Eastern District of Texas’s case 2:13-cv-1112. ContentGuard was represented by a team 17-deep from McKool Smith, including Samuel Baxter, Robert Cote, David Dehoney, Craig Donahue, Holly Engelmann, Shahar Harel, Seth Hasenour,...

- -
Read more

Chinese Smartphone ZTE Willfully Infringed Patents, East Texas Judge Says

(Tyler, Texas – Tuesday, October 13, 2015)  Federal Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the Eastern District of Texas denied an attempt by Chinese smartphone maker ZTE to have a $32 million judgement against them overturned and a new trial initiated. Judge Gilstrap said the jury did their job appropriately and effectively and were properly instructed on the law.   After deliberating less than 45 minutes, Jurors unanimously found in June that ZTE infringed all five asserted data entry claims,...

- -
Read more

Jury Finds Apple Infringes Another Patent, This Time Approaching $900M

(Tyler, Texas – Monday, October 12, 2015, Columbus Day)  A federal jury decided that Apple’s iPhones and iPads infringe on a University of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation patent, central to the devices’ A7, A8, and A8X processors.  Judge William M. Conley said that Apple’s licensing fees and other damages could total as much as 862 million dollars.   Apple’s stock has fallen close to 2% since the announcement.  Overall AAPL has fallen 18% in the last...

- -
Read more

Google Can’t Escape EDTX by Cherry-Picking Witnesses, says Judge

(Tyler, Texas – Friday, September 24, 2014)  Judge Roy Payne of the Eastern District of Texas denied Google Inc.’s Motion to Transfer a patent infringement case against them to Northern California. “The Court is significantly concerned that Google is not being fully candid,” wrote Judge Payne.  He further agreed Tuesday with the Rockstar Consortium LP that Google’s motion represented “cherry picking prior art witnesses,” that “non-party...

- -
Read more

Audible Magic

was denied its opposition to Blue Spike’s Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond by Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven in Blue Spike LLC v Texas Instruments, et al., Case No. 6:12-cv-00499-MHS, Dkt 1736, on September 4, 2014. Garteiser Honea PLLC represents Blue Spike. Audible Magic is represented by Alyssa Caridis, Christopher J. Higgins, Gabriel M. Ramsey, I. and Neel Chatterjee of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe; Eric Hugh Findlay and Walter Wayne Lackey of Findlay Craft; James V....

- -
Read more

Cognitec Systems Corp

and Cognitec Systems GmbH, with counsel Dwayne Goetzel, Ryan Beard, and Willem Schuurman of Meyertons, Hood, Kivlin, Kowert, & Goetzel, P.C., were denied their Motion to Dismiss Claims of Infringement in Blue Spike LLC v. Texas Instruments, Case No. 6:12-cv-499-MHS-CMC, Dkt. 1645, on July 22, 2014.  Blue Spike was represented by Garteiser...

- -
Read more

Clear Channel

represented by O’Melveny and Myers LLP against Blue Spike LLC’s Garteiser Honea, was denied in its Motion to Transfer Venue to the Southern District of New York in Blue Spike LLC v. Texas Instruments, Case No. 6:12-cv-499-MHS-CMC, Dkt. 1623, on July 2, 2014.  Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven wrote “On balance, the Court does not find Clear Channel has established that the Southern District of New York is a clearly more convenient...

- -
Read more

The US Government

was denied its Motion to Reduce Asserted Claims from 80 to 32 in Blue Spike LLC v. The United States, Case No. 1:13-cv-419-EJD, Dkt. 40, (CFC Apr 07, 2014).  Judge Edward J. Damich wrote “The Court agrees with Blue Spike’s argument that it could be prejudiced by limiting its asserted claims without a complete picture of the facts,” defined as before “claim-construction discovery is complete.”  Blue Spike is represented by Garteiser...

- -
Read more

Shareholders Sue Marvell for $1.5B Patent Loss

(April 7, 2014 – San Francisco, California): Shareholders—represented by Lee Voss—have sued as individuals the CEO Sehat Sutardja, his wife, and the board of Marvell Technology Group Ltd. for failure to license a patent which Marvell knowingly infringed. In 2012 a Pennsylvania jury entered a verdict for the inventor of the patent in the amount of $1.17 billion. The Honorable Nora Barry Fischer affirmed the jury’s verdict which was increased in March by $366 million bringing the total...

- -
Read more

EU Corporation Ordered to Produce Redacted Docs by End of Day

Photo by opensourceway / CC BY-SA (Wednesday, March 19, 2014 – Marshall, Texas): Cognitec Systems GmbH, based in Dresden, has been ordered to reproduce unredacted versions of its jurisdictional discovery. Initially, Cognitec Systems GmbH produced a set of heavily-redacted documents and justified the redactions by citing, among other reasons, European discovery limitations. However, after a Rule CV-26(e) “hotline” hearing with Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne, Cognitec Systems GmbH was...

- -
Read more
.