was denied its Motion to Reduce Asserted Claims from 80 to 32 in Blue Spike LLC v. The United States, Case No. 1:13-cv-419-EJD, Dkt. 40, (CFC Apr 07, 2014). Judge Edward J. Damich wrote “The Court agrees with Blue Spike’s argument that it could be prejudiced by limiting its asserted claims without a complete picture of the facts,” defined as before “claim-construction discovery is complete.” Blue Spike is represented by Garteiser Honea.
The US Government
Comments
Leave a Reply
Who We Are
Garteiser Honea is a litigation boutique dedicated to winning high-stakes trials and appeals in courts across the country. We handle complex intellectual-property and business disputes as lead counsel. And given our experience and familiarity with federal and state courts in East Texas and Northern California, we often entertain requests to serve as local counsel here. Our attorneys come from top-ranked law schools and from prestigious judicial clerkships for federal trial or appeals...
